Skip to navigation menu Skip to content
Informational Alert

Learn about progress on health equity and anti-racism efforts in Seattle Children’s fourth quarterly report.

Informational Alert

Seattle Children’s notifies affected patients about a data security incident.

Informational Alert

Insectary Projects

Sporozoite Extraction Automation

Malaria remains a substantial worldwide health problem. The Plasmodium parasite, the causative agent of malaria, develops into its human-infectious form in the salivary glands of female Anopheles mosquitoes. To perform research on Plasmodium transmission and initial development within the liver of the human host, researchers must dissect the salivary glands of hundreds of mosquitoes each week. There are malaria vaccine candidates that also rely on the frequent and speedy extraction of live parasites from mosquito salivary glands. The process of hand dissection is laborious for research and limits the ability to increase vaccine production to the scale needed for worldwide administration.

The Problem

Dissection of a moquitoMosquito dissections are a complex, tedious, and time-consuming task. Each mosquito has six salivary glands located where its head meets its thorax. Salivary glands of infected mosquitoes contain mature Plasmodium parasites. Researchers dissect out the salivary glands from each mosquito and put them into a tube where they will be ground to release the parasites. During dissection, careful attention is paid to avoid the mosquito midgut, located in the abdomen, which contains sporozoites that are both less infectious and less immunogenic than salivary gland sporozoites.

The salivary glands can be difficult to identify because of their size and difficult to separate from the rest of the mosquito because of their stickiness. The parasites can only survive outside of their host for a limited time, so the dissections need to happen quickly. Many projects are limited by the number of mosquitoes researchers can dissect. Significant training is involved for researchers to feel confident in their accuracy and speed. It can take months for users to feel comfortable and lots of practice to increase their dissection speed. Dissections are such a daunting and variable task; some labs are discouraged from researching liver-stage malaria.

Goals for Improvement:

  1. Ease workflow
  2. Improve efficiency
  3. Decrease training time
  4. Ease the burden of entry into malaria research
  5. Increase the pace of vaccine production


Standard dissection involves many precise and case-specific movements, so our first goal was to reduce the process to simple and repeatable motions that would be easy to automate in the future. To organize our ideas, we broke down the process into steps (collecting mosquitoes from their cage, transporting them to the device, dissecting, and cleaning and resetting the device) and listed ideas for how each could be achieved. The first important step of dissection is proper alignment of the mosquito. Typically, the mosquitoes are collected into a 50mL conical of ethanol and moved into a small mesh filter where they bunch up. We thought that we could take advantage of the mosquitoes’ normal resting position and capture them in a way where they are consistently set in a predetermined position.

Our first design was a cartridge-based system. We used vacuum to pull mosquitoes through a tube into a removable cartridge. The goal was to have the mosquito aligned such that its head would be peaking out, ready for decapitation.

Cartridge-based system for mosquito vacuum

Mosquito cartridge designs

Different cartridge designs: straight slot, tapered slot, straight slot with cover, tapered slot with cover. A properly aligned mosquito in a cartridge (straight slot with cover).

The mosquito alignment was working consistently so we moved toward increasing the amount of mosquitoes we could align at one time. We switched the cartridge design from a rectangular one to a cylindrical one, and then created the rotating cartridge system. This system had the capacity to hold eight mosquitoes.


Next, we played around with different ways to remove the salivary glands, trying to replicate the two main methods done by hand: pulling the head off slowing with the glands attached and then separating them off, and cutting the head off, pressing down on the thorax, and teasing out the glands from the rest of the guts.

We played around with sonication as a way to dissect mosquitoes. We experimented with sonicating different parts of the mosquito (whole mosquito, head & thorax, head & glands, just glands), and found that we could isolate the most parasites from whole mosquitoes and head & thoraxes. We knew we wanted to eliminate the mosquito abdomen because it has fewer infectious parasites, so we decided to move forward with devices to separate head & thoraxes.

thorax slicer.jpg

Semi-automated thorax slicer that uses a solenoid to open chamber where mosquito gets lodged.

dissector component.jpg

Machined a thorax slicer to reduce binding.


The final design of the squito splitter uses a rotary shear mechanism to separate the head & thorax of the mosquito from its abdomen.

The final design of the squito splitter

The Problem

Plasmodium sporozoites are traditionally isolated from mosquito salivary glands by manually grinding mosquito material in an Eppendorf tube using a pestle. This process is tedious and highly variable between trials and between researchers. Our goal was to standardize grinding approaches and reduce researcher workload.


The final design replicates a mortar and pestle. The user places the tube in the carriage and uses the control knob to choose the number of grinds. The stepper motor raises the carriage up to the pestle and the servo motor spins the pestle, after which the tube is lowered back down. The screen displays the number of grinds in real time.

The final design of the Squito Scrambler

Insectary Automation

Live mosquitoes are required to comprehensively study vector borne diseases. Standard rearing methods are tedious and time-consuming, and often generate inconsistent results. We have developed a series of systems to automate the rearing and handling of Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes with the goal of increasing the ease, efficiency, and accessibility of mosquito production.

The Problem

A crucial part of mosquito rearing is the daily draining of larval pans to harvest pupae. Each pan must be lifted and emptied into a 5-gallon bucket where a strainer collects the mosquito pupae and larvae.

Pans and a bucket used for breeding mosquitos

The 40-pound bucket of dirty water then gets hoisted and dumped into the sink. We can empty up to 200 pans in one day which equals about 70 gallons of water. The frequent emptying of this bucket (around 14 times/day) is unpleasant and exhausting. 


A self-emptying bucket for breeding mosquitos

We improved this task by placing a pump inside the bucket and putting the whole system on wheels. When the water inside the bucket reaches a certain level, the pump automatically activates and empties the water directly into the sink—no lifting necessary. The wheels enable the bucket to be easily rolled around the insectary. Both of these components allow insectary workers to empty pans without interruption, greatly reducing the time and physical energy required.

The Problem

As mentioned in the section above, a huge part of the insectary workload is emptying up to 200 larval pans a day in order to harvest pupae. Lifting pans of water is already an awkward and tedious task, but doing it in an extremely hot and humid environment makes it even more challenging and hazardous.

Older method of using pans for breeding mosquitos

After each pan is emptied, larvae are poured back in, and the pans need to be refilled with water—another laborious task. Our goal was to create a system that could reduce manual labor and human variation leading to a more efficient, consistent, and pleasant rearing experience.

Scale Model

Before building a huge new system, we wanted to create a mock-up model using the rearing pans we already had.

Models for pans used in rearing mosquitos

We built this mini version and reared mosquitoes in it for several weeks, testing out different angles for the pans and different methods for rinsing out every last larva. Once we were happy with the design, we began researching materials and components for the full-scale pupation station.

Build Process

Machines used in the creation of the Pupation Station

Components of the Pupation Station


The final design is a semi-autonomous system we call the pupation station that has the capacity to empty and refill with the click of a button. It is an array of large aluminum pans (6ft x 4ft) with electronically actuated valves. Each pan is angled slightly to help the water drain out quickly. The direction of the tilt and the placement of the valve alternates with each pan. The whole system is on wheels in case it needs to be moved.

Final design of the Pupation Station

When the user wants to drain the system, they use the control panel to select the “empty” function. All valves will open, and the pan contents will start to drain out. There is a hose hooked up so that the user can easily spray water to guide all the larvae out. At the bottom of the system is a strainer that catches the larvae and pupae. The water flows into the trough which functions exactly like the self-emptying bucket—a pump automatically activates and drains the water into the sink. Once the pans have drained, the user can select the “fill” function to refill all the pans with the perfect amount of fresh water.

A frontal view of a pupation station

This system simplifies the rearing process and reduces the workload compared to manual methods. The pupation station reduces the time spent emptying pans per week by two-thirds and completely eliminates heavy lifting. It also increases the consistency of the process, which maximizes mosquito yields.

The Problem

A volumetric flaskThe standard method for separating pupae from larvae is called “cold watering” and includes pouring the mosquitoes into a volumetric flask and filling the bottom half with room temperature water and the top half with cold water. The pupae will rise to the top and can be poured off and put into cages. The larvae will remain at the bottom, and once the pupae are off, they can be poured back into the pans to continue developing.

The volumetric flask has some limitations. The mosquitoes need oxygen to breathe, and the very small opening on the flask means that the mosquitoes cannot survive in there for long. The separation can happen very quickly with a small number of mosquitoes, but as our production has increased, we have noticed die-off among the larvae when they were kept in the flask for too long. Our goal was to design a device with an easy way to get larvae out fast and with a bigger diameter so that more larvae and pupae could get oxygen.


This manually controlled pupae separation funnel simplifies and improves the cold-watering process. When cold water is added, the pupae start rising to the top and the larvae sink to the bottom. This funnel has a valve at the base which allows the user to separate off the bottom layer of larvae and place them back into rearing pans within 30 seconds, reducing their time without oxygen. Instead of waiting for all the pupae to be poured off before the larvae can return to the rearing pans, this device makes it so that the bottom larvae can be released quickly without disrupting the cold-watering process. The diameter of the funnel is larger than that of the volumetric flask, allowing for greater access to oxygen.

A pupae separation funnel

The Problem

After the pupae are harvested, they are poured into petri dishes with water and then placed into cardboard cages. Once the pupae have all emerged into adults, it is important to remove the water from the petri dishes. This process is an important step for maintaining the cage environment because leftover mosquito debris can decompose and lead to contamination if it is not removed.

Mosquito cages

Cage with a new pupal dish (left). Cage where nearly all the mosquitoes have emerged—the dish is ready to be emptied (middle). Cage with pupal dish that has been properly emptied and closed (right).

A pipette pump

The standard method for emptying pupal dishes is to use a serological pipette pump, which pulls liquid up as one spins a gear with their thumb. We would carry all the cages that need to be emptied from the incubator to the sink and empty them one by one. The serological pipette would need to be inserted into the cage 3 or 4 times in order to pull out all the water. This process is tedious, slow, and messy.


We designed a simple vacuum system that allows for the rapid emptying of pupal dishes. This system consists of a suction tube, a waste flask, and a vacuum pump. The whole system can sit right next to the incubator, so there is no need to move the cages anywhere.

A vacuum pump for emptying mosquito cagesThe user turns on the vacuum, opens the incubator, and inserts the suction tube into a cage. Without turning off the vacuum, the user moves the tube from one cage to another. This system allows for quick and continuous dish draining at a rate of 5 seconds per cage compared to the manual rate of 45 seconds per cage.

A mouth aspirator, which is used to manually transfer mosquitos from one cage to another.

The Problem

To transfer mosquitoes from one cage to another, researchers often use mouth aspirators. Not only is it unsanitary to put one’s mouth on laboratory equipment, but it is also uncomfortable and easy to make mistakes. We wanted to create a system that would transfer mosquitoes safely and efficiently, without using our mouths.


The system consists of a suction lid for the destination cage, a vacuum pump, and a transfer tube. The user places the suction lid on the destination cage and puts one end of the transfer tube into the destination cage. After turning on the vacuum, the user puts the other end of the transfer tube into the cage with mosquitoes—the decrease in pressure in the destination cage pulls the mosquitoes through the transfer tube into the destination cage.

A diagram outlining insectary devices.

This device enables quicker transfer of mosquitoes and is easier and safer for the user. The direct transfer tube is a significant improvement over the mouth aspirator when considering mosquito survival because mosquitoes are not compacted against each other during transfer.

The Problem

The standard method of feeding mosquitoes is soaking cotton balls in sugar water and placing them on top of the mosquito cage. The cotton balls typically dry out within 24 hours and need to be replaced on a daily basis. We were looking for a solution that would increase the amount of time the cotton balls would stay moist, specifically to avoid coming in over the weekend just to feed.


This new setup consists of a plastic flow tube filled with sugar water and plugged with a soaked cotton ball. The sugar tube is placed at an angle against the rim of the cage so that the cotton ball lays flush with the netting and the back end of the tube sticks up. As the cotton ball dries out, it wicks up the sugar water in the tube, remoistening the cotton ball. This setup triples the amount of time the cotton ball stays wet.

Sugar water tubes used for feeding mosquitoes

By clicking “Accept All Cookies,” you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage and assist in marketing efforts. For more information, see Website Privacy.

Accept All Cookies